California Church IMPACT
empowering & mobilizing people of faith to be effective advocates in public policy
  • Home Page
  • IMPACT Blog
  • About & Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Key Issues
    • Human RIghts
    • LGBTQ Rights
    • Health Care
    • Economic Justice
  • Take Action
    • Resources
  • DONATE
  • CCC
  • Prop 64 Faith Livestream

What Part of “All God’s Children” Will We Ever Observe?

5/25/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
​Editor's Note: Since Libby wrote this piece last week, following the mass murders in Buffalo, we have been horrified to learn of more horrific mass murders at Robb Elem
entary School in Uvalde, Texas.  When will people of faith move beyond "thoughts and prayers" to take substantive action?
Picture
​by Elizabeth Sholes, Director Emerita Public Policy

The mass murder of 10 Black Americans Saturday May 14 was sickening to all people of conscience. The shooter left massive evidence of his deliberate and calculated intent in his car and on his electronic gear. This was not an act of a mentally-ill person but one who carefully and deliberately planned the attack to get rid of as many Black people as possible.
 
We by now have read that he embraced the “replacement theory” propagated by extremists. It is the fear, that has been around since at least the 1960s, that the white race (as if it’s one solid block of people) is being replaced by people of color, especially immigrants.  Why that led the shooter to target Black Americans is unclear, but extremism is rarely rational. 
 
The shooting at a supermarket, TOPS, on the East Side has more than general horror for me. I lived in Buffalo for many years and was the originator of an effort to get a community-owned supermarket into that neighborhood.  “Our Market” was its name.  It did not succeed for a lot of reasons, the TOPS finally came to this food desert area. 
 
I’m glad of that, but the effort to build a community owned store was wonderful; it put me in contact with many community members and especially with the Masden District then-Council Member, David Collins who was a man of extraordinary vision and concern for his constituents.  He had a civil rights legacy second to few, and his actions were always principled and concerned for people and their needs.
 
Thanks to David’s friendship, I was involved in his campaigns, his activism for social justice, and through him met other good people, some of whom became friends. For years they were my “warmth of other suns”, anchors in my city to what was good, righteous, just, and downright fun.  I associate all we did as passionate justice coupled with raucous laughter, hard work followed by dancing, unending campaigning and delicious food.  It just doesn’t get better than that.
 
To have this area the target of such hate is incomprehensible. To have these people, these good, decent, hard-working, and loving people, cut down so disgustingly is almost more than I can bear.
 
How do we end these horrors?  For those of us who are white, where is our voice in all this?  How do our congregations and our voices matter?  
 
When do we make manifest that “All God’s Children” does not have qualifiers?  When we hear a congressional representative say children refugees at the border don’t deserve infant formula, when we read of hate crimes on the rise against everyone but especially Asian Americans blamed for COVID, when we see LGBTQ people targeted for simply being who they are, we see that too many professed Christians have “exception clauses” in their hearts.  When people die for the color of their skin, we have well and truly lost our way. 
 
It is up to us. We have to bear witness against hate.. We cannot be silent.  These are not political issues – these are the most profound values of faith and democracy. It takes courage, no doubt about it, but we will not honor either our faith or our nation is we are silent.  Silence is assent. And it is a moral cowardice we can no longer accept.
 
We have to challenge bias, prejudice, hate rhetoric, and acts of violence. We have to call out our elected officials who engage in such disgusting lies. We need to write to them, we need to challenge the media both locally and nationally to stop promoting “replacement theory” or any other biased and inhumane propaganda that serves to dehumanize anyone.
 
When Asian women were shot to death in Atlanta, the chief of police said the shooter was “having a bad day”.  A bad DAY?  The public outcry led to an apology from the chief and a renewed effort to investigate the hate-based murders.  
 
Here in Sacramento at a public meeting a city council member blamed the meth epidemic on Latin American immigrants. That is absolutely not true; meth is a local “cottage industry” in white communities around the Bay Area per the Department of Justice. I called him out on it for inflaming both anti-immigrant and anti-homeless views here in Sacramento. 
 
Word got back to me that he hates me. Fine. Oddly, I can live with that. Who would I be if that had gone unchallenged?  He can hate me. I bet he never says that again.
 
If we are going to sit in our pews on Sunday, we have to live the Word the remainder of the week. No one will stop this hate but us. We must do it with courage and without returning the hate.  But we must do it. 
 
We can be silent no more.
0 Comments

California Council of Churches IMPACT Statement on the Texas Anti-Abortion Law

9/3/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
California Council of Churches IMPACT has long had a Legislative Principle upholding women’s right to access abortion as a reproductive option. They also have the right to refuse that option. The fundamental moral underpinning of this position is respect for women’s moral agency and their first amendment right to exercise personal conscience over their own lives.

We therefore condemn the new Texas law allowed into operation by a cowardly action of the Supreme Court. The latter did not even hold a hearing. It denied standing to women, certainly the people most impacted. It made this decision by indecision – in the dark of night without a single voice raised about differences of morality, law, and faith being raised. This is too large a decision for such a small act from the highest court of the land.

The Texas law now limits a woman’s access to abortion to the 6th week of gestation, long before most women even know they are pregnant, and worse, allows snoops and snitches, even total strangers, to accuse women of having an abortion, to turn them in to a web site, and for anyone who aided her – physician, nurse, friend who drove her to the doctor – to be fined $10,000 with the money going to the snitch.    Brave New World.

The Bible is entirely silent on abortion. We will find no laws or rules there. We can find clear evidence from the New Testament and Jesus’ inclusion of women among his followers that he did not perceive them as second-class people, as objects of disregard or control. Women were prominent in his ministry, the ones who kept the faith with him through the crucifixion, to whom he appeared in resurrection.  Literal or mythical, the story is important in our regard for women and their moral capacities. Jesus honored that. So should we.

We can also be clear about how we may judge when life begins. One may recall that in some versions of scripture, Mary is described as “quick with child” just prior to Jesus’ birth.   The Texas law decided that life begins with heartbeat.  That’s their rationalization for the 6-week limitation.  Common Law and much of Protestant assessment of conception, maintains it begins much later at viability, the point at which a fetus can live outside the womb. Common Law determined that before viability, a woman was “merely pregnant” but not “quick with child”.  

This law also violates the religious freedom of those, such as many in the Jewish faith, whose teachings are clear that life does not begin until the ruach (breath/spirit) enters the body with the first breath. 

That distinction is upheld in Roe with no limits on abortion until viability or when the fetus is “quick”.  After viability only compelling needs for the mother, her health and life, can justify an abortion.  

Roe v Wade was decided by the Supreme Court in 1973 based on these long-standing Common Law assessments regarding conception and pregnancy. The decision built on fundamental principles about human reproduction that had operated in England and its colonies then in the United States for centuries.  

Texas law and Supreme Court ruling has thus radically deviated from our own nation’s laws. 




​
(from The Rev. Susan Russell (@revsusanrussell), All Saints, Pasadena)
​

The whole point of the 1973 Supreme Court decision is to give women agency over these matters. For some, personal belief makes abortion unacceptable. For others, these principles of faith and Common Law are moral precepts that offer her abortion as an option in her life.  In other words, Roe compels no one to act against her conscience. She is the only person, in consultation with those of her choosing, to decide what is morally essential in her life.

Texas, with the aid of an indifferent and irresponsible Supreme Court, has imposed a single religious view on every woman.  That is heartily unacceptable. Those promulgating the Texas law have spoken of upholding “Christian values”. That’s not remotely accurate. Where Roe gives total freedom of choice to those not wishing to have an abortion as well as those who do, the Texas law has eradicated the open-hearted Protestant and many other religions’ views of life and value of women.  

There is not one good thing to be said about either the Texas law or the craven way it was authorized to proceed. We as people of faith stand in opposition to this law and the Supreme Court decision. We encourage our members to raise their voices against both the denigration of women and the evisceration of our own right to faith principles.  

Thank you.

0 Comments

California Church IMPACT Recommends: Oppose the Recall

8/9/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
California Council of Churches IMPACT position: OPPOSE
 
California Gubernatorial Recall Election
September 14, 2021
California Council of Churches IMPACT position: OPPOSE
 
The voters of the state of California have been through this before. In 2003 we voted to oust then-governor Gray Davis, followed by the election of Arnold Schwarzenegger as our successor governor.  He won with just 3% of the vote in a very crowded field of contenders. Many may remember that the reason behind the recall was the state’s energy cost crisis for which Gray Davis was blamed.  However, after the recall, nothing changed. Why? No one could fix the problem any faster or better than Davis and the legislature was trying to do. What we wound up with was chaos, not competence. It did not serve us well.

Today the recall against Governor Gavin Newsom rests on similar pillars.  He mandated public health measures during a pandemic. He supposedly hasn’t fixed the immigration problem. Or the water problem. Or myriad other global problems.  The same kinds of forces that hobbled Governor Davis now affect our current governor. They lie outside the capacity of any one person or state to correct.  All we can observe is whether how the problems are being handled are as decent, democratic, and humane as we would wish.  

“Recalls are meant to deal with malfeasance and rampant corruption, not disagreements in policy. Such do not exist and aren’t even being alleged.  The fundamental principles underlying a recall are not even being claimed by the recall promoters.”

Are mistakes made?  Of course. Are the actions self-interested, crooked, detrimental to our populace? No, they are not. Recalls are not meant to deal with disagreements in policy, but malfeasance and rampant corruption.  Such do not exist and aren’t even being alleged.  The fundamental principles underlying a recall are not made manifest by even the recall promoters.

There is a reason the adage, “Don’t change horses in the middle of the stream” exists. When someone is coping with a set of dangerous and fearful issues, you don’t yank that person out of power – or the horse out of the stream – in the hope of someone or something better.  This time the field of those running to be Governor Newsom’s replacement are even less experienced, less competent, and less focused on the problems than the set offered to us in 2003.  

We deserve to have stability in our government. A recall and possible radical shift in power to someone unknown and incompetent who could win with a very tiny plurality, could render our state massively unstable for years to come. This is neither the time nor the reason to recall our governor.  California Council of Churches IMPACT opposes this action.

Even if you vote NOT to recall the governor, you may still pick a candidate to replace Newsom just in case. You do not have to choose a replacement.
 
For information on the list of candidates available if the recall succeeds, please go to Newsom recall: Who are the candidates for governor? at CalMatters.
 
CCI does not endorse candidates.  If your faith organization is interested in hearing from candidates, you may legally do so in an open candidates’ forum so long as you invite ALL candidates.  Even if one candidate declines to participate, document the invitation and receipt of that invitation to that candidate (such as a registered letter or record of the time and date of a phone call and the name of the party to whom you spoke), and you may still continue with the presentation.
 
If your candidate meeting is outside the church (such as a house party) and is billed as meeting with individuals as private citizens, it does not involve the church or faith institution, and there is no bar to your hearing from only one candidate.  Even if your invitation list is all members of your faith group, it is still private and not an institutional function.
 
Please do not EVER campaign for anyone within your place of worship!  If a candidate for public office is a member of your denomination or place of worship, remember that he or she is your friend first and foremost, and a candidate only outside those walls.  You do not get a ‘pass’ on political support simply because you know that person.
 
Do you want to share this with your congregation or others? Download a PDF of IMPACT's recommendations here. 
 
California Council of Churches IMPACT position: OPPOSE

 
California Church IMPACT • 4044 Pasadena Ave, Sacramento CA 95821 • (916) 488-7300 • churchimpact.org
The Rev. Dr. Rick Schlosser, Executive Director; Elizabeth Sholes, Director Emerita Public Policy

ca_church_impact-_oppose_recall.pdf
File Size: 264 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

0 Comments

We Need Your Voices on Expanding CA Hate Crimes Laws

6/2/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Dear Friends,

California Council of Churches and Church IMPACT have long advocated for effective legislation to fight the scourge of hate crimes.  We are facing another challenge this year.

No one can observe the shocking data on the rise of hate crimes in our state. Who among us has not seen the horrific videos of Asian Americans being brutalized, of rancid assaults on Jews, of increased violence against trans-gendered people, and vicious racism hurled at all people of color.

CCC and CCI represent a highly diverse body of people who can be potential targets of hate. We are thus part of a large coalition seeking to strengthen our hate crimes laws to stop these acts and protect our beloved community. We therefore are part of a 41-group coalition advocating for better and more effective hate crimes law enforcement.

We have been working to strengthen police enforcement of existing laws. We have amendments we wish added to the existing anti-hate crimes bill, AB 57 (Gabriel, D-45). The bill, while good, lacks what we believe are critical requirements that would massively strengthen our ability to stop hate crimes and offer far better justice to victims.

Our coalition is focusing on two things recommended by a recent state audit on hate crimes enforcement: 
-a requirement that every law enforcement agency have a model policy in conformation with that created by California's Police Officers Standards and Training (POST) and 
-that the state Attorney General be empowered to get compliance and reporting from those agencies.

We are inviting you and your congregation to join our coalition to add the weight of your moral voice and advocacy for your members to this petition. If you are willing to join us, please send your congregation's name, address, phone, and contact person's information to our coalition organizer:  Greg deGiere at greg@thearcca.org.  His phone is 916-224-7319.

Every congregation is welcome to become part of this coalition. We are also urging those congregations in San Diego to become involved for the simple reason that it is the home of our President pro tem of the Senate, Toni Atkins.  As AB 57 moves forward and can still be amended to include our requirements, her support needs San Diego area voices in particular.

If you wish to see our amendments and to read the bill itself, please let us know, and I will forward our 10-page fact sheet to you.  

We hope you will make a commitment to join us in this critically-important work.  We don't want just a bill - we want a bill with real ability to halt hate crimes and improve enforcement of our laws. 

 Hate violence and terror have to stop.  We need your help to get that done.
​
Thank you!

0 Comments

United Church of Christ Warns of Credible Threats to Liberal Churches Now through Inauguration Day

1/16/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
The United Church of Christ has issued a warning to Conference Ministers and others to be on alert for attacks on liberal churches. Those supporting racial justice, LGBTQ equality, immigrant rights, economic rights, etc. may become targets of extremists. 

The alert is based on threats made to various churches in advance of both promised rightwing extremist actions at state capitol buildings and at the upcoming inauguration.  The alert particularly focuses on January 17-20.  

Here is a link to a Newsweek brief story on this alert.     Here is the UCC statement.  

We do not think this is alarmist.  We think it is a prudent warning.

Many of you may recall that a few months ago an historic Black church, Asbury United Methodist, in Washington DC was vandalized for its "Black Lives Matter" banner.  The same happened in Sacramento, CA to a UCC church there.

This warning, while originating with UCC, is not limited to that denomination's churches.  Any church that has promoted justice issues or possibly with congregations that are dominated by immigrants or people of color may also be vulnerable.

Clearly state capital cities are a prime area of concern, but any area that has encountered contentiousness, threats, or high levels of political action need also to be on alert.

We recommend contacting your local police department and noting this warning.  As UCC recommends, those churches able to hold gatherings due to their COVID status, may wish to revert to online or other remote forms of worship from tomorrow through next week.  

Blessings on all of you, part of our beloved community, with heartfelt prayers for your safety and for that of your churches and centers of worship.  May all be safe from harm.
​

0 Comments

Assuring a free and fair election November 3

11/2/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Dear Friends,

We imagine most of you have already voted where early voting is possible.  However, many of you will be doing poll watching, helping out at ballot counting, and simply observing our fundamental system of elections.  Some of you may be bringing water, snacks, masks to those waiting in line. We know this is a most contentious year, and we bring you a few tips - just in case.

The FBI has told us that they are committed to watching out for anything like voter suppression, intimidation, anything that prevents someone from getting access to their polling place or ballot drop off location.  If you see anything, there is a nationwide number for the FBI that is easy to remember: it is: 
1-800-CALLFBI.  That is 1-800-255-4324. 

You will need to tell them exactly where you are, give your name and contact information if you have photos or videos of voter harassment.  An FBI agent will be deployed to that site.  Of course if there is actual threat or danger, first call 911.  If you live where the police are not very proactive, do it anyway. Their mere presence helps guarantee better safety.

The United Church of Christ has posted an outstanding resource guide for a free and fair election day, spiritual resources to help us through what may be dark days ahead, and other resources you may find useful.  To find this excellent guide please go here.

We all want our nation to engage  peacefully is what has been the foundational principle of our democratic republic: voting.  We hope these suggestions are not actually needed.  Routine, peaceful, even boring election ritual now seems quaint but actually is highly desirable.  So we wish you a dull November 3 as you do the essential work of democracy:  VOTE!  

Yours in hope of an event-free, cheerful election day-

California Church IMPACT

0 Comments

November 3, 2020, General Election Calendar

9/16/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
November 3, 2020, General Election Calendar
Summary:
10/19:  Last Day to Register to Vote: https://registertovote.ca.gov
Check Your Registration Status: https://voterstatus.sos.ca.gov
Track Your Ballot: WheresMyBallot.sos.ca.gov

Election Date: November 3, 2020 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
Voter Registration: Online or Postmark by October 19, 2020 or you can “conditionally” register and vote at your county elections office after the 15-day voter registration deadline.
Vote-by-Mail Ballot Request: Must arrive by October 27, 2020
Completed Ballots, Including Vote-by-Mail Ballots: Personally delivered ballots: Must be delivered by close of polls on November 3, 2020; Mailed ballots: Must be postmarked on or before November 3, 2020, and received by your county elections office no later than November 20, 2020.



Picture
 Voter Bill of Rights 
 Time Off to Vote
Where's My Ballot?
Picture
Tracking your vote-by-mail ballot—when it is mailed, received, and counted—has never been easier. The California Secretary of State is now offering Where’s My Ballot?—a new way for voters to track and receive notifications on the status of their vote-by-mail ballot. Powered by BallotTrax, Where’s My Ballot? lets voters know where their ballot is, and its status, every step of the way.

Sign-up at WheresMyBallot.sos.ca.gov to receive automatic email, SMS (text), or voice call notifications about your ballot.

The following counties are now offering Where’s My Ballot?:
Alameda
Alpine
Amador
Butte
Calaveras
Colusa
Contra Costa
Del Norte
El Dorado
Fresno
Glenn
Humboldt
Imperial
Inyo
Kern
Kings
Lake
Lassen
Los Angeles
Madera
Marin
Mariposa
Mendocino
Merced
Mono
Monterey
Napa
Nevada
Orange
Placer
Plumas
Riverside
Sacramento
San Benito
San Bernardino
San Diego
San Francisco
San Joaquin
San Luis Obispo
San Mateo
Santa Barbara
Santa Clara
Santa Cruz
Shasta
Sierra
​Siskiyou

Solano
Sonoma
Stanislaus
Sutter
Tehama
Trinity
Tulare
Tuolumne
Ventura
Yolo
Yuba

Don’t see your county on the list? You can see if your vote-by-mail ballot has been received and counted by logging into voterstatus.sos.ca.gov
Picture
Detailed Calendar
Full version available at https://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov//statewide-elections/2020-primary/section-8-general-calendar.pdf

9/4/20   MILITARY OR OVERSEAS VOTER BALLOT APPLICATIONS 
First day county elections officials may process applications for military or overseas voter ballots. Any applications received by the county elections official prior to this day shall be kept and processed on or after this date. If the applicant is not a resident of the county to which he or she has applied, the elections official receiving the application shall forward it immediately to the proper county. 
A request for a vote-by-mail ballot from a military or overseas voter is deemed an affidavit of registration and an application for permanent vote-by-mail status.

9/19/20   MILITARY OR OVERSEAS VOTER BALLOTS 
Last day for county elections officials to transmit ballots and balloting materials to absent military or overseas voters who have requested them by this date. If a military or overseas voter ballot application is received after this date, the county elections official shall transmit a ballot and balloting materials as soon as practicable. 

9/24/20 to 10/13/20   STATE VOTER INFORMATION GUIDE MAILING 
Period in which the Secretary of State shall mail state Voter Information Guides to all households in which voters were registered by September 4, 2020. This mailing is based on the information provided by county elections officials to the Secretary of State by September 14, 2020  
9/24/20 to 10/13/20   COUNTY VOTER INFORMATION GUIDE AND POLLING PLACE NOTICE MAILING
Suggested first day for the county elections official to begin mailing a county voter information guide and a polling place notice, which includes any vote centers, to each registered voter who registered at least 29 days before the election, unless the voter has opted to receive them electronically. The polling place notice may state whether the polling place is accessible to the physically handicapped. 

10/5/20   ALL COUNTIES MAIL EVERY ACTIVE REGISTERED VOTER A VOTE-BY-MAIL BALLOT AND PACKET
For this election, every active registered voter will be mailed a vote-by-mail ballot. 
No later than this date, county elections officials shall begin mailing each registered voter a vote-by-mail ballot, a vote-by-mail packet that includes an envelope with instructions on the use and return of the vote-by-mail ballot, and other information including the locations and hours of each vote center in the county or polling place. 
County elections officials shall have five days to mail a ballot to each person who had requested a vote-by-mail ballot by this date and five days for each voter who requests a vote-by-mail ballot after this date. 

10/5/20 COMPUTER PROCESSING OF VOTE-BY-MAIL BALLOTS 
Counties having the necessary computer capability may start to process vote-by- mail ballots on the 29th day before the election. Processing vote-by- mail ballots includes opening vote by mail ballot return envelopes, removing ballots, duplicating any damaged ballots, and preparing the ballots to be machine read, or machine reading them, including processing write-in votes so that they can be tallied by the machine, but under no circumstances may a vote count be accessed or released until 8 p.m. on the day of the election. 
All other county elections officials shall start to process vote-by-mail ballots at 5:00 p.m. on the day before the election, the results of which shall not be released until 8:00 p.m. on November 3, 2020 (E). 

10/5/20 to 10/27/20   VOTE-BY-MAIL BALLOT APPLICATION 
Period in which any registered voter may apply to the county elections official for a vote-by-mail ballot. 
No later than this date, the county elections official shall begin mailing vote-by- mail ballots, and shall have five days to mail a ballot to each person who had requested a vote-by-mail ballot by this date and five days for each voter who requests a vote-by-mail ballot after this date. 

10/6/20 to 11/3/20   VOTER'S CHOICE ACT COUNTIES AND NON-VCA COUNTIES: DROPOFF LOCATIONS OPEN
Beginning no later than 9 a.m., counties that are implementing the Voter's Choice Act and non-VCA counties (that will be providing at least one polling place per 10,000 registered voters, pursuant to Executive Order N-67-20) will open ballot dropoff locations. These locations shall be open at least during regular business hours beginning not less than 28 days before the election through Election Day. At least one ballot dropoff location shall be an accessible, secured, exterior drop box that is available for a minimum of 12 hours per day, including regular business hours. The minimum number of drop-off locations should be based upon voters registered as of August 7, 2020  

10/19/20   15-DAY CLOSE OF REGISTRATION FOR THE GENERAL ELECTION 
Last day to register to vote in the general election. The Voter Registration Form shall be mailed (postmarked by this date), submitted online using the Secretary of State's online voter registration application (COVR), or delivered to the county elections official by this date and is effective upon receipt. The Voter Registration Form may also be submitted by this date to the Secretary of State, Department of Motor Vehicles, or any National Voter Registration Act designated agency. 
A request for a vote-by-mail ballot from a military or overseas voter, if postmarked on or before this date, will be deemed an affidavit of registration and an application for permanent vote-by-mail status. When a county elections official receives and approves a registration application from a military or overseas voter, the official must provide that voter with a vote-by-mail ballot for each subsequent election for federal office in the state unless the voter fails to vote in four consecutive statewide general elections. 

10/19/20   NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS WITHIN STATE
Last day before the general election for any voter to send a notice or letter advising the county elections official of a change of address within the state. The notice or letter shall be mailed (postmarked by this date) or delivered to the county elections official by this date and is effective upon receipt. The notice or letter may also be submitted to the Department of Motor Vehicles or any National Voter Registration Act designated agency prior to the election. The county elections official shall correct the registration records accordingly. The notice or letter is in lieu of re-registering.  

10/20/20 to 11/3/20   CONDITIONAL VOTER REGISTRATION PERIOD 
Period in which an elector can “conditionally” register and vote provisionally at the county elections office, a satellite office, polling place, or vote center after the 15-day voter registration deadline. 

10/20/20   BILINGUAL PRECINCT BOARD MEMBERS 
Last day for county elections officials to prepare a list of precincts to which bilingual officers were appointed. A copy of this list shall be made available to the public. 

10/20/20 to 10/27/20   NEW RESIDENT REGISTRATION PERIOD 
Any person who becomes a new resident after October 19, 2020, may register to vote beginning on October 20, 2020, and ending October 27, 2020. This registration must be executed in the county elections office and the new resident shall vote a new resident’s ballot in that office. A new resident is eligible to vote for only president and vice president. 
The ballots of new residents shall be received and canvassed at the same time and under the same procedure as vote-by-mail ballots. 

10/20/20 to 11/3/20   NEW CITIZEN REGISTRATION PERIOD 
Period in which a new citizen is eligible to register and vote at the office of, or at another location designated by, the county elections official at any time beginning on October 20, 2020, and ending at the close of polls on November 3, 2020. 
A new citizen registering to vote after the close of registration shall provide the county elections official with proof of citizenship prior to voting and shall declare that he or she has established residency in California. 
The ballots of new citizens shall be received and canvassed at the same time and under the same procedure as vote-by-mail ballots. 

10/27/20   VOTE-BY-MAIL BALLOT APPLICATION — DEADLINE
Last day for the county elections official to receive any voter’s application for a vote-by-mail ballot, including an application from a military or overseas voter, and to issue such ballot for the general election. 

10/28/20 to 11/3/20   REQUEST FOR VOTE-BY-MAIL BALLOT — LATE CONDITIONS 
Period in which counties that are implementing the Voter's Choice Act will open one vote center for every 10,000 registered voters. The locations and hours of operation of these vote centers will be available in vote-by-mail materials and on the county website. Any voter registered in the county may visit any voter center in order to receive voter services or vote. The first day a vote center opens, the elections official shall deliver to the precinct board a list of military and overseas voters who registered under Section 3108. 

10/31/20 to 11/3/20   VOTER'S CHOICE ACT COUNTIES AND NON-VCA COUNTIES: OPEN ONE VOTE CENTER FOR EVERY 10,000 REGISTERED VOTERS
Counties that are implementing the Voter's Choice Act (VCA) and non-VCA counties that will be providing at least one polling place per 10,000 registered voters, pursuant to Executive Order N-67-20, will open one vote center or "regular" polling place, for every 10,000 registered voters. The locations and hours of operation of these polling locations will be available in vote-by-mail materials and on the county website. Any voter registered in a VCA county may visit any vote center in order to receive voter services or vote. 


11/2/20   MANUAL PROCESSING OF VOTE-BY-MAIL BALLOTS 
Counties not having the necessary computer capability to process vote-by-mail ballots may begin to manually process vote-by-mail ballots at 5:00 p.m. on this date, but under NO circumstances may the vote count be accessed or released until 8:00 p.m. on November 3, 2020 

11/3/20   GENERAL ELECTION DAY 
On this date, the polls shall be open throughout the state from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. 
An elector can "conditionally" register and vote provisionally at the county elections office, a satellite office, polling place, or vote center. 

11/3/20   HAND DELIVERED OR FAXED VOTE-BY-MAIL BALLOTS RETURNED IN ORDER TO BE COUNTED — DEADLINE
Voted vote-by-mail ballots hand delivered to the office of the elections official who issued the ballot, or at any polling place, vote center, vote-by-mail drop-off location, or drop box in the state must be received by the county elections official by the close of the polls on Election Day. 

Last day a military or overseas voter who is living outside of the United States (or is called for service within the United States on or after October 27, 2020), may return his or her ballot by facsimile transmission or by certified remote accessible vote-by-mail system. To be counted, the ballot returned by facsimile transmission shall be received by the voter's elections official by 8:00 p.m. on Election Day and shall be accompanied by an identification envelope and a signed oath of declaration. 

11/20/20   MAILED VOTE-BY-MAIL BALLOTS — LAST DAY TO BE COUNTED 
Any vote-by-mail ballot cast shall be deemed timely if it is received by the elections official via the United States Postal Service or a bona fide private mail delivery company by the seventeenth day after Election Day and either of the following is satisfied: 1) the ballot is postmarked on or before Election Day or is time stamped or date stamped by a bona fide private mail delivery company on or before Election Day, or it is otherwise indicated by the United States Postal Service or a bona fide private mail delivery company that the ballot was mailed on or before Election Day, or 2) if the ballot has no postmark, a postmark with no date, or an illegible postmark, and no other information is available from the United States Postal Service or the bona fide private mail delivery company to indicate the date on which the ballot was mailed, the vote by mail ballot identification envelope is date stamped by the elections official upon receipt of the vote by mail ballot from the United States Postal Service or a bona fide private mail delivery company, and is signed and dated pursuant to Section 3011 on or before Election Day. 

12/1/20   STATEMENT OF RESULTS TO SECRETARY OF STATE — PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS
By this date, the county elections official shall send to the Secretary of State, in an electronic format, one complete copy of the returns for presidential electors. 


12/11/20  STATEMENT OF THE VOTE
Last day for the Secretary of State to prepare, certify, declare, and file a statement of the vote from the compiled election returns and post to the Secretary of State's website. 


12/14/20 2:00 p.m.   ELECTORAL COLLEGE CONVENES
At this time and date, the Presidential Electors shall assemble at the State Capitol to vote by separate ballot for that person for President and that person for Vice President of the United States who are, respectively, the candidates of the political party which they represent. These votes are mailed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. 
​

1/2/21   CERTIFICATES OF ELECTION — INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM RESULTS 
Last day of the Secretary of State to deliver to the State Printing Office certificates showing what laws or constitutional amendments, proposed by initiative petition and approved by the people, have gone into operation, and the date of going into operation, and the result of all elections upon any questions submitted to the electors of the State by initiative or referendum petition within the preceding two years. 

0 Comments

November 2020 Ballot Recommendations from IMPACT

9/9/2020

2 Comments

 
Picture
november_2020_ballot_recs_print.pdf
File Size: 185 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

impactsundays.pdf
File Size: 151 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

Many of you have received our recommendations for the statewide propositions on the November 2020 California General Election in the mail.  These have been mailed this week and we hope you will receive yours soon. Due to popular request, we are sending them out electronically too.  You can download the attached file or click on the links below if your email does not show the attachment.  Please feel free to reproduce, use, and distribute for your congregation, family, and friends.  If you want suggestions on how these are used by other congregations throughout the state, please see the attachment/link for IMPACT Sundays.

And, as always, please contact us with any questions or needs.

Can You Host an IMPACT Sunday?Many congregations throughout California host IMPACT Sundays at their congregation, place of worship, or homes and other locations. Attached is a flyer with suggestions on how some congregations do this, but you are welcome to use your creativity!   If you need copies of our ballot guide, you can download them here (we hope to have a short version posted in early October) or contact us.  We can send you copies but do ask for help covering the cost of printing and postage.

If you do hold an IMPACT Sunday or distribute our recommendations, please be sure to let us know about it! 
For more information, please contact us.
​
And, as always, please contact us with any questions or needs.

SUMMARY
Proposition 14: YES
Proposition 15: YES
Proposition 16: YES
Proposition 17: YES
Proposition 18: YES
Proposition 19: YES
Proposition 20: NO
Proposition 21: YES
Proposition 22: YES
Proposition 23: YES
Proposition 24: NO
Proposition 25: NO


Proposition 14                                                   Recommendation: SUPPORT
 
Authorizes Bonds to Continue Funding Stem Cell and Other Medical Research. Initiative Statute.
 
This is a $5.5 billion bond that will cost approximately $7.8 billion when repaid over 25 years. The bonds will continue funding the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, which in turn funds research and development of stem cell medicine. CIRM began with Proposition 71 in 2004 and has ramped up both basic stem cell research and has produced 64 clinical trials covering 11 different medical specialties from cancer to macular degeneration. CIRM operating costs are confined to 7.5% of the funding with the rest to research. Work is overseen by a 35-person board. 
 
 
Proposition 15                                                  Recommendation: SUPPORT
 
Increases Funding for Public Schools, Community Colleges, and Local Government Services by Changing Tax Assessment of Commercial and Industrial Property. Initiative Constitutional Amendment. 
 
This measure will rework the property tax rates set in 1978 for both residential and commercial property by Proposition 13. Commercial and industrial property would now be taxed based on fair market value. Rather than setting tax rates based on the age of the company, Proposition 15 will tax businesses based on size and income. Those with values of less than $3 million plus all residential properties (apartments), and agricultural operations will retain Proposition 13 valuations and rates. In addition, small businesses at set income levels will be exempt from personal property tax. The new revenues, estimated to bring $6.5-11.5 billion annually, will fund K-12, community colleges, and local governments with emphasis on improving older, more deteriorated school systems in low-income areas. 
 
 
Proposition 16                                                  Recommendation: SUPPORT
 
ACA 5 (Resolution, Chapter 23). Weber. Government Preferences. 
 
This resolution, only nine words long, repeals Proposition 209 (1996) that prohibited the state from considering race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in public employment, education, or contracting. Rather than creating the “color blind” society promised, Proposition 209 prohibited all considerations of race and other attributes thus enabling discrimination to re-expand. Race, gender, etc., and the experiences produced in life because of them are part of the holistic experience of any person. Quotas and “point” systems remain unconstitutional. Affirmative action was meant to give equal consideration to people whose contributions to society are based in part on these ascriptive life experiences. If Prop. 15 passes, that can be restored. 
 
 
Proposition 17                                                  Recommendation: SUPPORT
 
ACA 6 (Resolution, Chapter 24). McCarty. Elections: Disqualification of Electors.
 
This measure restores the right to vote to people on parole. Those on probation, who avoided prison, keep their right while on probation. Those on parole, the status that comes after prison release, do not. Those opposing voting rights for former convicts say it gives voting rights to those who may reoffend, and to violent criminals. However, if the parole board sees fit to release someone to return to productive society, that restorative action must include the full rights and responsibilities of the society. 
 
 
Proposition 18                                                  Recommendation: SUPPORT
 
ACA 4 (Resolution, Chapter 30). Mullin. Elections: Voting Age.
 
This measure would allow 17-year-olds who will be 18 at the time of the next general election to vote in primaries and special elections. The argument for this measure is that it would engage youth in greater likelihood of voting in general elections. Voting is essential, and we support the sentiments embodied in former President Barack Obama’s eulogy for Rep. John Lewis, champion of the Voting Rights Act: “...we (must) remember what John [Lewis] said: ‘If you don’t do everything you can to change things, then they will remain the same. You only pass this way once. You have to give it all you have.’ As long as young people are protesting in the streets, hoping real change takes hold, I’m hopeful; but we cannot casually abandon them at the ballot box...We cannot treat voting as an errand to run if we have some time. We have to treat it as the most important action we can take on behalf of democracy.”
 
 
 
Proposition 19                                                  Recommendation: SUPPORT
 
ACA 11 (Resolution, Chapter 31). Mullin. The Home Protection for Seniors, Severely Disabled, Families, and Victims of Wildfires or Natural Disasters Act.
 
A similar measure was defeated in 2018 but has been rewritten. The measure helps qualified homeowners who are “house rich, income poor,” while it prevents use of low-tax-rate property for income generation. By terms of Proposition 58 (1986), property with low tax rates due to age of purchase could be transferred to children and grandchildren with the same rates and valuations. In many instances wealthy individuals use that property as rental income far exceeding the tax rates paid. Proposition 19 does expand the use of existing low rates for seniors, those with disabilities, victims of wildfire or natural disaster, allowing transfer or senior rates to any county and allowing the transfer three times v. once. However, it bars inherited property from being used for income generation and requires it must be used as the primary residence by those who inherited it. All such rental properties will be reassessed upward to full market status thus generating new tax revenue. This impacts 40-60,000 taxpayers. 75% of new revenues will be assigned to the Fire Protection Fund, 25% to County Revenue Protection Fund for any possible loss of tax revenue. Every older property released for actual sale will also generate higher tax rates and more revenue for the county. 
 
 
Proposition 20                                                  Recommendation: OPPOSE
 
Restricts Parole for Non-Violent Offenders, Authorizes Felony Sentences for Certain Offenses Currently Treated Only as Misdemeanors. 
 
This proposition makes changes to policies related to criminal sentencing charges, prison release, and DNA collection. It would reclassify many misdemeanors as “wobblers,” permitting crimes to be either misdemeanors or felonies. These would include firearm and vehicle theft, and unlawful use of a credit card as well as serial crime, regardless of content, and organized retail crime. The proposition would prohibit early release by reclassifying crimes as “violent.” Other crimes, committed prior to 2014 reforms, would require the perpetrator to have his or her DNA on file. Furthermore, rather than having the parole board consider applicants on the basis of fulfilling their sentences and in-prison behavior, this proposition directs the parole boards to consider the person’s age, employment prospects, etc. In sum, a person could remain in prison, regardless of compliance, if he or she were poorly educated and less employable; often racially biased. This proposition will undermine past sentencing reform measures passed by voters in recent elections. Crime is significantly lower in the past few years per the Public Policy Institute of California. These new standards would not stop crime but will swell our prison population through reclassification of offenses, to no discernable public benefit.
 
 
Proposition 21                                                  Recommendation: SUPPORT
 
Expands Local Governments’ Authority to Enact Rent Control on Residential Property. Initiative Statute.
 
Expands local governments’ ability to implement rent control on some housing now covered by the 1995 Costa-Hawkins Act. Under the CHA, rent control cannot be implemented for housing built or occupied after 1995. Rent control cannot be used on dwellings with distinct titles such as single-family homes, condos, townhouses, etc. In light of the soaring rents in every part of California, this year’s Proposition 21 would allow local governments to abolish some CHA provisions. It upholds the bar on property first occupied in the past 16 years owned by natural persons (not those owned by corporations) with no more than two separate units, e.g., single family, condos, duplexes, subdivided units such a cooperative and community apartments. In all other eligible properties, local governments can limit rent increases to 15% during the first three years after a vacancy. While it does nothing to reduce current rental rates, it would slow the further rate increases for new tenants. Because the decision will remain in local control, it gives voice to local citizens based on perceived differences in their own communities, housing stock, and rental demand. 
 
 
Proposition 22                                                  Recommendation: SUPPORT
 
Changes Employment Classification Rules for App-based Transportation and Delivery Drivers. Initiative Statute.
 
This proposition reworks a part of AB 5 (2019) that ended “independent contractor” status for many jobs. The proposition addresses only “app-based drivers” — those who offer ride sharing or delivery services such as Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, Instacart, etc. While AB 5 sought greater economic equity for such “gig” or casual engagement work, it has created real problems for those driving. Most drivers work erratically to fit family and other considerations into their schedules and work for several different companies at the same time. Defined shifts would cause them to quit or create real hardships. Labor groups are correct to demand assured income, benefits, protections for these novel workers, new to the labor economy. This proposition shows they have largely succeeded. The companies have created this measure that puts into law the demands put forth by unions and advocates. It will provide minimum wage plus 20%, covering drive time to pick up and from delivery; mileage; insurance for both drivers’ vehicles and workplace injury; guaranteed retention of tips; and payments for workers’ health insurance. Unions still oppose this measure, but it’s better wages than what the legislature could create for a unique group of workers, does not prohibit unionization, and offers the kinds of security as well as flexibility desired by drivers. The companies were forced to do well by their drivers. In sum, unions and advocates already won this argument for drivers that is better for these workers than most part time employees will get under AB 5 or current labor laws. It would be immoral to deny drivers this benefit simply because it came from the employers and not from unions and others. The proposition in no way impacts temporary workers who are hired for 9 to 5 positions. Those are very different working conditions and not addressed in this measure. They remain covered by the terms and standards set by AB 5. While this proposition does not go as far as we wish, it is a step in the right direction for many workers. There is nothing in this initiative to prevent the legislature from further strengthening it. We understand this is controversial, but for these reasons, we join our friends at the California NAACP in supporting this measure. 
 
 
Proposition 23                                                  Recommendation: SUPPORT
 
Authorizes State Regulation of Kidney Dialysis Clinics. Establishes Minimum Staffing and Other Requirements. Initiative Statute. 
 
Revisiting Prop. 8 (2018), this measure regulated private, for-profit dialysis clinics. It requires a physician on-site at dialysis clinics and monitoring blood pathogens regularly. This was defeated last time due largely to fears that for-profit dialysis centers would use the increased regulations to raise fees and to turn down poor or underinsured patients. All patients are guaranteed equal treatment in this measure. These provisions, coupled with state regulation of clinics trying to close entirely, provide safeguards for access to service along with safeguards for patient well-being. Dialysis often transmits blood-born infections; with too little monitoring, such infections can be fatal. SEIU health care workers’ union sponsors this ballot measure. It has no impact on their unionization efforts. This version of the ballot measure provides patient-centered regulation and will improve an essential service many people need but are not now obtaining either in fact or in quality.
 
 
Proposition 24                                                  Recommendation: OPPOSE
 
Amends Consumer Privacy Laws. Initiative Statute. Expands Provisions of the CA Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and Creates California Privacy Protection Agency to Implement and Enforce the CCPA.
 
The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) was written by the Legislature, is enforced by the Attorney General, and went into full effect July 1, 2020. Proposition 24 purports to strengthen that law, but it has many unintended consequences that appear to weaken it. For those not well versed in technology, it is confusing. Many of the provisions about data collection that seem excellent, e.g., prohibitions on racial profiling, legal status as former convict, undocumented immigrant, can slip through the cracks. You may have seen popups asking if some company you’re researching may use your data, but saying NO is no guarantee that your private information is not part of their baseline management information or that opting out won’t cost you more money. Since the CCPA has, at this writing, operated for less than a month, these changes, opposed by ACLU, Consumer Federation of California, and Media Alliance, among others, simply cannot tackle how the existing law will function. Ballot measure terms and conditions are very hard to overturn legislatively no matter how poorly they operate. We need to see how CCPA functions now before we radically and substantially amend it, especially with provisions that may make us more, not less, vulnerable to invasions of our privacy and personal data. 
 
 
Proposition 25                              Recommendation: SUPPORT via a NO vote.
 
Referendum to Overturn a 2018 Law that Replaced Money Bail System with a System Based on Public Safety Risk. 
 
This referendum challenges a state statute to replace cash bail with risk assessments for suspects awaiting trial. SB 10 gave the courts discretion to assess low, medium, and high-risk defendants who could be released or detained on those assessments rather than on a demand for cash bail. Most proffering bail had to come up with 10% for a bail bond from a private provider, and if that was impossible, the defendant languished in jail. Wealthy people got out. Poor people remained. However, SB 10 did not actually improve chances of greater justice. “Risk assessment” may be racially, culturally, and economically biased. There are no guidelines in SB 10 for what sets determinations. All three CA affiliates of American Civil Liberties Union opposed SB 10 with its unintended racial biases and potential for greater not lesser inequity. ACLU is not opposing this ballot measure since it is sponsored by the for-profit bail industry. IMPACT, however, believes the greater good requires revisiting the entire issue to assure real justice. Because it is a referendum, a YES vote is to UPHOLD SB 10. A NO vote is to return to cash bail while we revisit the issue on risk assessments and other criteria.
 
 
SUMMARY
Proposition 14: YES
Proposition 15: YES
Proposition 16: YES
Proposition 17: YES
Proposition 18: YES
Proposition 19: YES
Proposition 20: NO
Proposition 21: YES
Proposition 22: YES
Proposition 23: YES
Proposition 24: NO
Proposition 25: NO
 

2 Comments

IMPACT Sundays

9/9/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture

​We will need to modify suggestions for holding IMPACT Sundays in a pandemic, but that does not make it any less important to encourage your family, friends, co-workers, and church members to get out in vote.  

Please consider sharing these recommendations however you and your congregation are communicating with others.




Some suggestions on how you can help

California Church IMPACT began “IMPACT Sundays” in 2005 to have socially active members of congregations share our ballot guides with other members of churches, temples, synagogues, and other places of worship. Obviously, whatever method you use (save for standing outside) involves the cooperation of your institution of faith, so please do obtain permission.
Some ways in which members conducted IMPACT Sundays include:
  • Inserting the long or short form of our ballot guide within church bulletins
  • Posting the short or long Ballot Guide on church bulletin boards
  • Handing out CCI Ballot Guides at church coffee hours
  • Placing CCI Ballot Guides with other literature handed out routinely
  • Handing out CCI Ballot Guides outside of church as people enter or leave
  • Hosting a discussion forum on ballot issues
  • Posting the link to the guide from CCI on your church email

Other political actions you may take

IMPACT does not endorse candidates. If your faith organization is interested in hearing from candidates, you may legally do so in an open candidates’ forum so long as you invite ALL candidates. Even if one candidate declines to participate, document the invitation and receipt of that invitation to that candidate (such as a registered letter or record of the time and date of a phone call and the name of the party to whom you spoke), and you may still continue with the presentation.

If your candidate meeting is outside the church (such as a house party) and is billed as meeting with individuals as private citizens, it does not involve the church or faith institution, and there is no bar to your hearing from only one candidate. Even if your invitation list is all members of your faith group, it is still private and not an institutional function.

Please do not EVER campaign for anyone within your place of worship! If a candidate for public office is a member of your denomination or place of worship, remember that he or she is your friend first and foremost, and a candidate only outside those walls. You do not get a ‘pass’ on political support simply because you know that person.

Picture
impactsundays.pdf
File Size: 151 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

0 Comments

New podcast giving diverse voices a "seat at the table" by CA Controller Betty Yee

9/9/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Dear Friends,

We became very aware during the pandemic shutdown how essential our unseen working people were to our lives.  They are too often the voiceless whose work, lives, necessities, and solutions go largely unheard.

CA State Controller, Betty Yee, is bringing us a new podcast, something you may listen to on your computer with just a click.  "A Seat at the Table" gives an outlet for those voices.  As we approach Labor Day, those earning a living from the restaurant industry will be featured and heard.  We look forward to future podcasts from Controller Yee. This is a potentially major contribution to the full inclusion of omitted people in our civic conversations - and, we hope, solutions.

From Controller Betty Yee:I am excited to announce the launch of my podcast, The California Table!

LISTEN TO EPISODE 1: On the High-Road: Righting the Restaurant Industry




​
























I have been moved by so many throughout California who have stepped forward, before and during the COVID-19 public health crisis and recession to give voice to the needs and experiences of their communities --- communities often lacking a seat at the decision-making table.


Join me in meeting some extraordinary Californians who are creating their own tables to tackle some of the most pressing issues of our time.

I hope you will find these podcasts informative and inspiring as they call upon us to act and make a difference.

Thank you for listening to The California Table.

Sincerely,

Betty

We at California Church IMPACT hope this has been insightful and that you will join future podcsts of "The California Table".  Thank you.

0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    Author

    The Rev Dr Rick Schlosser

    Archives

    September 2022
    May 2022
    September 2021
    August 2021
    June 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    January 2020
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    October 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    January 2014
    September 2013
    February 2013
    October 2012

    Categories

    All
    Civil Rights
    Economic Justice
    Elections
    Environmental Justice
    Faithful Fridays
    Health Care
    Racism
    Reproductive Rights
    Women's Rights

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photo used under Creative Commons from ProComKelly