California Church IMPACT
empowering & mobilizing people of faith to be effective advocates in public policy
  • Home Page
  • IMPACT Blog
  • About & Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Key Issues
    • Human RIghts
    • LGBTQ Rights
    • Health Care
    • Economic Justice
  • Take Action
    • Resources
  • DONATE
  • CCC
  • Prop 64 Faith Livestream

State Ballot Proposition Recommendations for the June 3, 2014 Election

5/20/2014

0 Comments

 


Housing for Homeless Veterans and Transparency in Local Government

In every statewide election, the California Council of Churches IMPACT makes recommendations for the state ballot propositions. We base them on our faith principles and arrive at them through prayerful discernment and careful study.   This June there are only two propositions on the state ballot.

Proposition 41: Veterans Homes and Homeless Prevention Bond Act — YES

Proposition 42: Public Records. Open Meetings. State Reimbursement to Local Agencies — YES

YES ON PROPOSITION 41: VETERANS HOUSING AND HOMELESS PREVENTION BOND ACT

 Proposition 42 will allow conversion of an existing $600 million in state bond revenue to construct and rehabilitate housing for California’s large population of homeless veterans. The housing will be linked with essential services to strengthen veterans’ independent living. The funds will construct or upgrade affordable, supportive, and transitional housing for homeless and nearly-homeless veterans. No new funds will be required.

YES ON PROPOSITION 42: PUBLIC RECORDS. OPEN MEETINGS. STATE REIMBURSEMENT TO LOCAL AGENCIES

 In the past, when budgets have gotten tight, the Legislature has suspended of the local government open-meeting and public-records requirements rather than pay their costs. Proposition 42 will put these transparency requirements into the state constitution, where they cannot be suspended. It also will require local governments to pay the very low costs of these requirements.

The people’s ability to control their government depends on freed access to information. Proposition 42 is a major step toward assuring that neither the state not the local governments can deny the people basic access to information. Requiring local governments to pay the costs of local government transparency seems simply fair, and it should give local governments an incentive to streamline public access and keep costs down.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    The Rev Dr Rick Schlosser

    Archives

    September 2022
    May 2022
    September 2021
    August 2021
    June 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    January 2020
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    October 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    January 2014
    September 2013
    February 2013
    October 2012

    Categories

    All
    Civil Rights
    Economic Justice
    Elections
    Environmental Justice
    Faithful Fridays
    Health Care
    Racism
    Reproductive Rights
    Women's Rights

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photo used under Creative Commons from ProComKelly